Godgod, the creator of the original Nth rooms, was revealed to be a 24-year-old college student named Moon Hyung-wook. Moon was apprehended a couple of months after Cho, in May 2020, and later sentenced to 34 years in prison for coercing 20 women and girls into sharing 3,800 sexually explicit videos of themselves.
kerala college girls cyber sex videos
INUttar Pradesh and Bihar the members of the police force have earned the reputation of being the official face of the law-breakers. They are feared by law-abiding citizens because of their limitless capacity to harass them. Various police commissions have expressed concern over the brazen abuse of the uniform by the so-called guardians of the law. A recent proof of the criminal indifference of the police to performing their basic duty has come from the crime-infested belt of Farrukhabad, Kanpur and Etah. If one goes by the version of Ms Durga Bharti, a dismissed principal of a college run by the controversial Sakshi Maharaj, the police has refused to register a first information report of rape against the Samajwadi MP under pressure from his political mentor Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav. She has accused Sakshi Maharaj of having raped her and thereafter threatening her with dire consequences if she did not meet his demand for girls from the college under her charge. The police has so far refused to register a case of rape and criminal intimidation on the basis of the charges levelled by the former college principal against her former employer. There appears to be sufficient evidence to prove that the police is under tremendous political pressure from Samajwadi Party President Mulayam Singh Yadav not to touch Sakshi Maharaj. On August 5 IGP of Kanpur Ashish Mitra said that investigations in the case were at a final stage and that special teams had been sent to Etawah, Mainpuri and Farrukhabad for arresting Sakshi Maharaj. However, a few days later Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav entered the picture and thereafter the police developed cold feet.The Durga Bharti-Sakshi Maharaj episode has once again brought into focus the general tendency of the police to take the side of the powerful instead of acting on the complaints of the members of the weaker sections of society. However, in the present case it would be unfair to blame only the police for not letting Ms Durga Bharti lodge a formal FIR against her alleged tormentor. It must be remembered that Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav, who is reportedly protecting Sakshi Maharaj, was responsible for withdrawing criminal cases against former Bandit Queen Phoolan Devi when he was Chief Minister of UP. She is now a Samajwadi Party member of the Lok Sabha. The dacoity and murder cases still pending against her have been put in the deep freeze. It is doubtful whether Ms Durga Bharti would get justice under the present dispensation because the Samajwadi Party chief has launched a counter-offensive for protecting Sakshi Maharaj. He has demanded the removal of the Etah District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police for "harassing the Maharaj". However, all is not lost for the dismissed college principal, provided her case is based on facts and is not an attempt to tarnish the image of Sakshi Maharaj. In October, 1999, the Supreme Court delivered a path-breaking judgment which allows a complainant to file an FIR even at a police station which has no territorial jurisdiction for investigating the complaint. All that the police station where the FIR is lodged is required to do is to forward the case to the one where the alleged crime has actually been committed. She should call for a copy of the judgement to examine the possibility of filing an FIR at a police station beyond the area of influence of the Samajwadis. The landmark ruling concerns the case of a woman who was thrown out of the house by her husband in Patiala. However, she filed the FIR at a police station in Delhi which resulted in the apex court verdict. Of course, the better option would be to take away from the police the "discretionary powers" in the matter of registering FIRs. In the event of the complaints being found to be false deterrent action should be initiated against the complainants. 2ff7e9595c
Comments